News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Enough 

Enough

24 Feb, 2010 08:33 AM
by david wright

The potential impact on visual amenity and noise levels will provide the basis for an appeal by four local residents against the proposed Mt Bryan Wind Farm which is planned for the Razorback Ranges east of Hallett.

They are appealing the June 4, 2009, decision of the Regional Council of Goyder’s Development Assessment Panel, which gave planning approval to AGL Energy for the development.

The appeal will be considered by the Environment, Resources and Development Court of South Australia with an expected five-day hearing to start with a site inspection of Mt Bryan on May 24.

A public meeting called by the appellants packed the Hallett Institute supper room on Friday night to hear barrister Peter Quinn, who grew up at Hallett and is the brother of appellant Bill Quinn, provide a progress report.

Peter Quinn said the appellants would argue that the Goyder DAP missed the target of the development plan in relation to visual amenity and noise.

He said the appellants hoped to engage Australia’s leading planning lawyer, Brian Hayes QC, to put their case to the ERD Court.

Mt Bryan farmer Andy Thomas, who lives within one kilometre of 11 wind turbines which are part of the AGL Energy’s Hallett Stage 2 wind farm, would give evidence about the effect of windfarm noise on his life.

Mr Thomas told Friday night’s meeting he suffered from constant headaches, and the noise from the turbines limited his sleep to three-and-a-half hours per night.

He said it was the growl of the gearbox, or the turbine itself, which created the noise problem.

“That’s the noise that gets to you, it’s not the swish,” Mr Thomas said. “You start to move the hell away from the turbines and that headache eases.

“The noise is like a force coming at you all the time. Even in winter, with all the windows shut, the noise still gets to you.”

Mr Thomas said AGL had investigated the noise problem at his property but had not yet provided the results of noise intensity tests conducted prior to Christmas.

The meeting was also read a letter from Clements Gap resident Jenny Stringer who said wind farm noise was affecting her health and television reception.

Peter Quinn said the appellants would engage a landscape architect to provide an expert opinion about the impact of the wind farm on the visual amenity of the area.

Local resident David McDonald showed a series of photos to the meeting which portrayed the untouched beauty of the Mt Bryan environment, including trees which are 2000-4000 years old according to DNA testing.

“I’ve always thought the eastern hills of Hallett are a beautiful backdrop for the township,” he said.

Appellant Dawn Booth said about half of the $55,000-$60,000 required to fund the appeal had been pledged.

“AGL has said to us ‘we have a bigger cheque book than you’ and they have,” she said.

Peter Quinn said the bid by the appellants was courageous and they should be commended. “What you’re doing is important work and you must not be afraid,” he said.

“Your children and your grandchildren will thank you for this and you must not be afraid.

“The support you’ve given them simply by turning up tonight has lifted their spirits,” he told the crowd.

In response to the Northern Argus’ query, an AGL spokesman said: “The alleged noise and visual amenity issues were considered by the Regional Council of Goyder’s Development Assessment Panel where AGL presented an extensive case addressing all issues raised.

“We are happy for the court to examine any alternative views that may be presented.

“In terms of noise, AGL is obliged to engage an independent noise expert to verify compliance with all EPA guidelines on noise emissions. On Hallett 2 we are currently undertaking post-construction measurement of noise levels from the wind farm in accordance with the development approval in order to demonstrate compliance with the EPA guidelines.

“AGL has presented extensive work on visual impact (the nearest turbine to Hallett is 3km away) and we believe this is essentially a matter of personal taste – some people like the look of wind farms, and some people don’t.

“The groundwater issue has been examined by independent groundwater consultants as part of our environmental submission and found to be without basis.

“No one has been able to explain how a wind farm could impact aquifers.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Perhaps a coal fired plant would be better?
Posted by Mick, 24/02/2010 10:22:12 AM, on Northern Argus
Yes mick a coal fired plant would be much better, as would nuclear or geothermal, hydro or even solar. With the first 4 you can turn them on or off when they are needed, last time I looked you couldnt control the wind could you?? And why does wind need a giant subsidy to be viable? Maybe you can tell us why we should pay 3 or 4 times more for UNRELIABLE power? Seems a bit odd to the majority of people who are sick of being ripped off with things that don't work.
Posted by andy, 25/02/2010 12:06:48 AM, on Northern Argus
The silent majority have hd a gutful of useless wind turbines. Labor will lose seats over this rubbish. Go solar
Posted by Nick, 25/02/2010 8:54:52 AM, on Northern Argus
Go for it nobody needs another Waubra, with Warbra disease effecting the health of local families.
Posted by Bruce, 25/02/2010 9:10:09 PM, on Northern Argus
Unfortunately, on odd occasions the squeaky wheel gets oiled. In this case I hope not. Any alternative to nuclear or coal, which is more evironmentally friendly is a godsend. Perhaps instead of wind turbines they should build a wall of solar panels on the Razorback, but I suppose that would incur lack of sunlight for growing feed and crops etc. as the sunlight would get reflected away. Don't forget the story about the boy who cried wolf. With respect to Messers Kelly, Quinn & Booth.
Posted by David, 2/03/2010 6:04:27 PM, on Northern Argus

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The appellants of the Regional Council of Goyder Development Assessment Panel decision to approve a 38-turbine wind farm on Mt Bryan, near Hallett. From left are Dawn Booth, Lyn Kelly, Bill Quinn and Malcolm Kelly.
The appellants of the Regional Council of Goyder Development Assessment Panel decision to approve a 38-turbine wind farm on Mt Bryan, near Hallett. From left are Dawn Booth, Lyn Kelly, Bill Quinn and Malcolm Kelly.

Most popular articles




 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...