Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 The great divide in school staff numbers 

The great divide in school staff numbers

Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard has encouraged parents to use the My School website to hold schools and teachers to account.

We, too, joined the rush last week to look at what all the fuss was about. After digging around the website for just a few hours, we would humbly like to suggest that accountability could go a little further up the food chain.

Here's what a few hours work uncovered. According to enrolment and staffing stats for a selection of more than 20 large (mostly 1000-plus enrolments) metropolitan schools taken from the My School website, to get a teacher at a large, metropolitan non-government school you need to have about 10.1 students. To get a teacher in a large, metropolitan government school you need 14.8 students.

Primary schools A-Z

Secondary schools A-Z

Top of the class - the 50 top primary and secondary schools by key measures

In terms of non-teaching staff in schools - those employees who relieve teachers of administrative and other support tasks - you need 21 students to get a support staff member in a large, metropolitan non-government school and a staggering 84.4 students in a similar-sized government school.

But, like all comparisons between schools, these stats - while revealing - must be taken in context. The schools compared are similar in total enrolment and geographical location, but many of the non-government schools are K-12 schools that cater for boarders.

To check for this, Hurlstone Agricultural High School, a government boarding school, was included in the selection, even though it is a little smaller in enrolment size. It has 14.1 students for each of its teachers and 60.3 for each of its support staff. A smaller non-government school that also caters for boarders, Tara Anglican School, has 10.6 students per teacher and 16.3 students for each non-teaching staff member. And, as a further check, Australian Bureau of Statistics data on student/teacher ratios back up these statistics.

So, if, as Gillard advises, there are any lazy teachers needing a kick up the proverbial, don't look for them in a government school. Clearly if the website is correct and government schools are, on average, outperforming many of their fee-charging equivalents, then government school teachers must be working very hard indeed, against the odds. They not only teach more students, they are given vastly less support to do so.

The urgent question is: how long can they maintain this performance in the face of such skewed staffing handicaps?

Some may point out that it may be private resources that are going into paying for this extra staffing in non-government schools, but that still raises the question of why we continue to generously publicly subsidise such well-endowed schools when so many government schools are doing it tough. Private funding drives divides between schools the world over but, as the My School website so tellingly points out, should it be the role of government to continue adding fuel through its funding policies?

Public school supporters and communities should be grateful that the My School website, despite its anomalies and limited perspective, has shone a bright light on to this glaring inequality.

It provides a clear and transparent direction about what needs to be done to maintain, support and improve Australia's education performance, particularly for the 70 per cent of students who attend public schools - a direction that is not about bricks and mortar or even technology and computers, but about teachers and the support they need to do their job properly and help kids learn.

Government schools urgently need not just more teachers, but more support staff.

Given the comparisons above, even if we doubled the number of support staff in most public schools tomorrow, they still would not come within cooee of many of their large private school neighbours.

Given such clear information and their stated commitment to an education revolution, we confidently expect the Rudd government to make correcting this glaring staffing imbalance its first priority. Otherwise, all Australians should hold them to account.

Jane Caro and Chris Bonnor wrote The Stupid Country: How Australia is Dismantling Public Education.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1




comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Members of the Teachers Federation (yes, they gave up using an apostrophe like so much of their duty) are always whining and complaining. I don't know how I put up with it.
Posted by Jack, 2/02/2010 11:31:55 PM
Parental comment ought to permeate right through the education departments to the Ministers. I think that ought to make for more interesting reading.
Posted by To the Top, 2/02/2010 11:35:33 PM
Well of course if teachers had to work a full year then we might all have a bit more sympathy for them. However, to state the obvious, private schools, especially those of religious denomination should receive not one cent of public monies. If the parents want to send their little darlings to private school, let them pay the full cost. Especially if they want to send the little angels off to religious schools for a spot of abuse, the taxpayer should have no part of it. These schools should not even exist, they are just institutionalised child abuse havens. DoCS should intervene.
Posted by Cricket Tragic, 3/02/2010 12:28:12 PM
Yes religion can be abusive, but you should accept the right of parents to educate their children in the way they choose. You have no choice at a public school, where the teacher can easily be a marxist or a radical man-hating feminist, and which is worse for impressionable kids? Parents who choose to send their children to non-government schools are already paying taxes, as well as school fees on top of this. Surely some of their taxes should be spent on their own kids, and that is why non-government schools deserve some of the government funding.
Posted by Bob, 4/02/2010 10:32:49 AM
Many teachers are employed on short-term contracts, or as casual relief staff, with no holidays or sick leave if the teacher happens to fall in the latter category of employment. The more highly educated teachers are excluded from permanent employment at some of the schools because other, lesser qualified teachers, feel threatened. It's no wonder that many parents believe that their children are not receiving the full benefits of education, and opt to seek schools with higher literacy and numeracy results. They're entitled to!
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee, 4/02/2010 4:28:54 PM
Cricket Tragic, you don't have a clue about teaching, do you? I'm not a teacher, but my mother has been for over 30 years. She didn't stop working when the bell went; she often stayed up until the early hours marking and preparing work. We lived in a small country town where students travelled over an hour to get to the high school. The only way some year 12 students could do the more challenging courses was to schedule them outside school hours. Not only did my mother teach these courses after school, but she also provided a bed for those who had nowhere else to stay overnight. All my childhood we had year 12 students joining us for dinner & breakfast at least once a week. She also ran courses during school holidays. Her commitment to the job is not unusual - good teachers don't clock off at 3pm. I am so over this country bashing our teachers - the one thing we've all got in common is some teacher, somewhere, once taught us something! So have a little respect and support them. Increase the marks required to get into teaching courses, double the pay, and attract the best. Who would want to enter a profession that is constantly derided & poorly paid?
Posted by mamasaid, 6/02/2010 2:32:58 PM
Strange how my post in support of teachers didn't make it past the moderator...
Posted by mamasais, 8/02/2010 11:05:55 AM
Were is new EDUCATION that Mr Rudd told us was coming as soon as he got in office all he has done is spent the money Mr Howard hard aside gave most people $900 ,put Australia in the red, so there goes any more money into the Education. We cant blame the teachers/ schools it's the "rudd goverment " Ididn't vote for them.?
Posted by lissy, 9/02/2010 2:09:34 PM
You didn't learn to spell, either!
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee, 12/02/2010 4:12:04 PM
Here in the ACT an over reliance on casual teachers and semester long contracts in the public system has meant that many teachers don't get holidays but periods of unemployment. Those who do get school holidays deserve them because of the many unpaid hours of work they do at home and after school hours. Many former casual teachers, like myself, have withdrawn from the system because it doesn't provide a viable income.
Posted by bo, 4/03/2010 9:46:36 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
MySchool website TV ad campaign
MySchool website TV ad campaign

Most popular articles

Smiths Mid North Motor Co.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...